WHO ICTRP trial

Comparison of Efficacy between Conventional Method an Adapted Method of…

TCTR20240409007 · Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) · Not Recruiting

Key facts

Trial ID TCTR20240409007
Public title Comparison of Efficacy between Conventional Method an Adapted Method of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Kidney Disease Patients
Scientific title Comparison of Efficacy between Conventional Method an Adapted Method of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Kidney Disease Patients
Primary sponsor the Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention in the Northeast of Thailand (CKDNET)
Registry Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR)
Recruitment status Not Recruiting
Study type Interventional
Phase Phase 3
Countries Thailand
Conditions Comparison of primary outcomes between the efficacy of APD-A and APD-C treatments included weekly clearances of urea (weekly KT/Vurea), and creatinine (CrCL, nCrCL). Adapted automated peritoneal dialysis, Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis…
Interventions The administered PDF volume and dwell time were calculated for short cycles, a PDF volume of 600-800 ml/m2 BSA and a dwell time per cycle of 1 APEX time (30-60 minutes). For long cycles, a PDF volume of 1,300 - 1,500 ml/m2 BSA with a dwell…
Registration date Sep 4, 2024
Target size 21
Secondary IDs Nil Known
Registry page thaiclinicaltrials.org

At a glance

  • No Results available

Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.

About WHO ICTRP trial registrations

The WHO ICTRP combines trial registrations from primary registries worldwide into a single searchable index. Contact and ethics-committee details are not shown here.

Source: World Health Organization (WHO), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) · Source date:

Browse all WHO ICTRP trial registrations