WHO ICTRP trial

Comparison between Robotic Assisted versus Manual Tasks during Epiretinal…

NL-OMON48774 · Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (NL-OMON) · Not Recruiting

Key facts

Trial ID NL-OMON48774
Public title Comparison between Robotic Assisted versus Manual Tasks during Epiretinal Membrane Peeling Surgery
Scientific title Comparison between Robotic Assisted versus Manual Tasks during Epiretinal Membrane Peeling Surgery - Robot versus manual epiretinal membrane peeling
Primary sponsor Preceyes BV
Registry Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (NL-OMON)
Recruitment status Not Recruiting
Study type Interventional
Countries The Netherlands
Conditions cellophane maculopathy epiretinal membrane;10047060;10015957;cellophane maculopathy;epiretinal membrane
Interventions Evaluated surgical steps will include: membrane staining, fluid-fluid exchange, initiation of a flap, peeling, air-fluid exchange, targeted illumination. ;Comparison;Manual;Robot;Vitreoretinal
Registration date Jan 30, 2020
Target size 15
Secondary IDs NL66979.078.18
Registry page onderzoekmetmensen.nl

At a glance

  • Yes Results available

Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.

About WHO ICTRP trial registrations

The WHO ICTRP combines trial registrations from primary registries worldwide into a single searchable index. Contact and ethics-committee details are not shown here.

Source: World Health Organization (WHO), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) · Source date:

Browse all WHO ICTRP trial registrations