FDA inspection
Qiagen Manchester Ltd.: FDA inspection ending Feb 17, 2012
FDA inspection 773094 · Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) · Manchester
Key facts
| Inspection ID | 773094 |
|---|---|
| Firm | Qiagen Manchester Ltd. |
| FEI number | 3009391812 |
| Address | CityLabs 2.0, Hathersage Road |
| City | Manchester |
| Fiscal year | 2012 |
| Inspection end date | Feb 17, 2012 |
| Classification | Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) |
| Project area | Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices |
| Product type | Devices |
At a glance
- 1–9 Citations
- 1–9 Posted citations
- No Warning letter followed
- Yes Form FDA 483 issued
- No Establishment inspection report (EIR) exists
- 1–9 Inspections at this FEI
Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.
About FDA inspections
FDA inspections are classified as No Action Indicated (NAI), Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) or Official Action Indicated (OAI). Inspections of individual clinical investigators are not published here.
Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), inspection classification data