FDA inspection
Benchmark Electronics (Thailand) Public Co., Ltd.: FDA inspection ending Oct 27, 2010
FDA inspection 695675 · No Action Indicated (NAI) · Bang Pa-In
Key facts
| Inspection ID | 695675 |
|---|---|
| Firm | Benchmark Electronics (Thailand) Public Co., Ltd. |
| FEI number | 3003899230 |
| Address | 94 Moo 1, Hi-Tech Industrial Estate, Banlane, Bang-Pa |
| City | Bang Pa-In |
| Fiscal year | 2011 |
| Inspection end date | Oct 27, 2010 |
| Classification | No Action Indicated (NAI) |
| Project area | Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices |
| Product type | Devices |
At a glance
- None Citations
- None Posted citations
- No Warning letter followed
- Yes Form FDA 483 issued
- No Establishment inspection report (EIR) exists
- 1–9 Inspections at this FEI
Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.
About FDA inspections
FDA inspections are classified as No Action Indicated (NAI), Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) or Official Action Indicated (OAI). Inspections of individual clinical investigators are not published here.
Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), inspection classification data