FDA inspection
FUJIFILM Healthcare Americas Corporation: FDA inspection ending Sep 17, 2010
FDA inspection 694750 · Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) · Edison, NJ
Key facts
| Inspection ID | 694750 |
|---|---|
| Firm | FUJIFILM Healthcare Americas Corporation |
| FEI number | 3005625991 |
| Address | 1100 King Georges Post Rd |
| City | Edison |
| State | NJ |
| ZIP | 08837-3731 |
| Fiscal year | 2010 |
| Inspection end date | Sep 17, 2010 |
| Classification | Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) |
| Project area | Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Med Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices|Product Evaluation: Medical Devices |
| Product type | Devices |
At a glance
- None Citations
- 1–9 Posted citations
- No Warning letter followed
- Yes Form FDA 483 issued
- No Establishment inspection report (EIR) exists
- 1–9 Inspections at this FEI
Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.
About FDA inspections
FDA inspections are classified as No Action Indicated (NAI), Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) or Official Action Indicated (OAI). Inspections of individual clinical investigators are not published here.
Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), inspection classification data