FDA inspection
Gerber Products Company dba Nestle Infant Formula: FDA inspection ending Mar 25, 2003
FDA inspection 263159 · No Action Indicated (NAI) · Eau Claire, WI
Key facts
| Inspection ID | 263159 |
|---|---|
| Firm | Gerber Products Company dba Nestle Infant Formula |
| FEI number | 3003520374 |
| Address | 5023 Venture Dr |
| City | Eau Claire |
| State | WI |
| ZIP | 54703 |
| Fiscal year | 2003 |
| Inspection end date | Mar 25, 2003 |
| Classification | No Action Indicated (NAI) |
| Project area | Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard |
| Product type | Food/Cosmetics |
At a glance
- None Citations
- None Posted citations
- No Warning letter followed
- Yes Form FDA 483 issued
- No Establishment inspection report (EIR) exists
- 10–99 Inspections at this FEI
Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.
About FDA inspections
FDA inspections are classified as No Action Indicated (NAI), Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) or Official Action Indicated (OAI). Inspections of individual clinical investigators are not published here.
Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), inspection classification data