FDA inspection
Naviera Coffee Mills, Inc.: FDA inspection ending Jun 8, 2000
FDA inspection 26045 · Official Action Indicated (OAI) · Tampa, FL
Key facts
| Inspection ID | 26045 |
|---|---|
| Firm | Naviera Coffee Mills, Inc. |
| FEI number | 1014002 |
| Address | 5401 E Henry Ave |
| City | Tampa |
| State | FL |
| ZIP | 33610-4844 |
| Fiscal year | 2000 |
| Inspection end date | Jun 8, 2000 |
| Classification | Official Action Indicated (OAI) |
| Project area | Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard |
| Product type | Food/Cosmetics |
At a glance
- None Citations
- 1–9 Posted citations
- No Warning letter followed
- Yes Form FDA 483 issued
- No Establishment inspection report (EIR) exists
- 1–9 Inspections at this FEI
Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.
About FDA inspections
FDA inspections are classified as No Action Indicated (NAI), Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) or Official Action Indicated (OAI). Inspections of individual clinical investigators are not published here.
Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), inspection classification data