FDA inspection
Padimont Candy Inc.: FDA inspection ending Jul 8, 2002
FDA inspection 229242 · No Action Indicated (NAI) · Mayaguez, PR
Key facts
| Inspection ID | 229242 |
|---|---|
| Firm | Padimont Candy Inc. |
| FEI number | 3003738110 |
| Address | 116 Calle Wilson, Parque Castillo |
| City | Mayaguez |
| State | PR |
| ZIP | 00682 |
| Fiscal year | 2002 |
| Inspection end date | Jul 8, 2002 |
| Classification | No Action Indicated (NAI) |
| Project area | Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Food Compos, Stds, Labeling & Economics|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard|Foodborne Biological Hazard |
| Product type | Food/Cosmetics |
At a glance
- None Citations
- None Posted citations
- No Warning letter followed
- Yes Form FDA 483 issued
- No Establishment inspection report (EIR) exists
- 1–9 Inspections at this FEI
Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.
About FDA inspections
FDA inspections are classified as No Action Indicated (NAI), Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) or Official Action Indicated (OAI). Inspections of individual clinical investigators are not published here.
Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), inspection classification data