Clinical trial
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal…
NCT00372190 · Radboud University Medical Center, Other · Completed
Key facts
| NCT number | NCT00372190 |
|---|---|
| Title | Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse. |
| Official title | A Prospective and Comparative Study of the Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse |
| Lead sponsor | Radboud University Medical Center, Other |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Conditions | Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| Intervention type | Device, Procedure |
| Interventions | Tensionfree vaginal mesh kit (Prolift), classic vaginal prolapse surgery (fascia plication) |
| Enrollment | 194 |
| Start date | Aug 1, 2006 |
| Primary completion | Dec 1, 2009 |
| Completion | Dec 1, 2015 |
| First posted | Sep 6, 2006 |
| Last update posted | Jul 3, 2017 |
| Countries | Netherlands |
At a glance
- 10–99 Study sites
- Yes Results posted
- None Linked FDA submissions
Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.
About ClinicalTrials.gov studies
ClinicalTrials.gov is the U.S. National Library of Medicine's registry of clinical studies conducted around the world. Contact and investigator details are not shown here.
Source: U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), ClinicalTrials.gov · Source date: