Clinical trial
Comparison of Infant Pain Responses Between Two Different Methods of Urine…
NCT00298584 · The Hospital for Sick Children, Other · Unknown status
Key facts
| NCT number | NCT00298584 |
|---|---|
| Title | Comparison of Infant Pain Responses Between Two Different Methods of Urine Collection |
| Official title | Comparison of Infant Pain Responses Between Two Different Methods of Urine Collection for Diagnosis of Infection: Suprapubic Aspiration and Urinary Catheterization |
| Lead sponsor | The Hospital for Sick Children, Other |
| Status | Unknown status |
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Conditions | Pain, Intensive Care, Neonatal |
| Intervention type | Procedure |
| Interventions | Percutaneous Suprapubic Aspiration, Urethral Catheterization |
| Enrollment | 50 |
| Start date | Feb 1, 2006 |
| First posted | Mar 2, 2006 |
| Last update posted | Feb 23, 2007 |
| Countries | Canada |
At a glance
- 1–9 Study sites
- No Results posted
- None Linked FDA submissions
Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.
About ClinicalTrials.gov studies
ClinicalTrials.gov is the U.S. National Library of Medicine's registry of clinical studies conducted around the world. Contact and investigator details are not shown here.
Source: U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), ClinicalTrials.gov · Source date: