Clinical trial
Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patient…
NCT00164996 · Chinese University of Hong Kong, Other · Completed
Key facts
| NCT number | NCT00164996 |
|---|---|
| Title | Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patient With or Without Local Pharyngeal Anaesthesia |
| Official title | Comparison of Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patients With or Without Local Pharyngeal Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Lead sponsor | Chinese University of Hong Kong, Other |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Study type | Interventional |
| Conditions | Dyspepsia |
| Intervention type | Device, Procedure |
| Interventions | Local pharyngeal anaesthesia, Ultrathin endoscope |
| Enrollment | 400 |
| Start date | Sep 1, 2004 |
| Primary completion | Sep 1, 2010 |
| First posted | Sep 14, 2005 |
| Last update posted | Feb 17, 2012 |
| Countries | China |
At a glance
- 1–9 Study sites
- No Results posted
- None Linked FDA submissions
Counts are shown as ranges. Exact figures, trends and every underlying record are available in Orca1.
About ClinicalTrials.gov studies
ClinicalTrials.gov is the U.S. National Library of Medicine's registry of clinical studies conducted around the world. Contact and investigator details are not shown here.
Source: U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), ClinicalTrials.gov · Source date: